Pigdogfucker: Questions for debate
I'm going to answer Pigdogfucker's Questions for debate
1, that would be murder - so they should go to jail until they are no longer a danger
2, the person is not harming anybody, so no crime here
3, the person is not harming anybody, so no crime here
4, the person is not harming anybody, so no crime here
5, the person is not harming anybody, so no crime here. They should not even be on any watch lists. If they feel they want help it should be available, but since they have hurt nobody their liberty and privacy should not be curtailed.
In all the questions but the first the people who's actions are in question have not harmed anybody, or called for anybody to be harmed, therefore there is no crime to answer and the state has no place in these private.
posted by chris at 6/04/2007 10:58:00 pm
2 Comments:
So presumably you wouldn't advocate sending people to jail for buying child pornography either?
Buying no they shouldn't go to jail, creating yes they should. Particually under the current rules which do not have to be of children, or even people, due to the rules on digitally created images. The current rules even mean that if two teenagers who are over the age of consent film themselves doing it that is considered child porn and they can be sent to prison.
Post a Comment
<< Home